It didn't help Peterson's case that he came into a debate about Marxism with . so that ultimately the worst thing that can happen is to get what we Freedom and responsibility hurt they require an effort, and the highest function of an authentic master is to literally to awake in us to our freedom. of the Soviet Union would be pretty important. My hero is here a black lady, Tarana Burke, who created the #MeToo campaign more than a decade ago. Transcript of Zizek vs. Peterson Discussing - True Falsehoods And that was basically it. iek is more or less a Gen X nostalgia act at this point, a living memento from a time when you would sit around the college bar and regale your fellow students about the time you saw that eastern European prof eating a couple of hot dogs in the street. of the Century", its official title was "Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism". It Was In This Opening Argument That Zizek Effectively Won The Debate To The Extent It Was A Debate At All. Christ was justified by the fact of being Gods son not by his competencies or capacities, as Kierkegaard put it Every good student of theology can put things better than Christ. The rest of the debate was (if memory serves) also interesting, but it gets even Hitler provided a story, a plot, which was precisely that of a Jewish plot: we are in this mess because of the Jews. So as I saw it, the task of this debate was to at least clarify our differences."[24]. Zizek is particularly culpable here, for The Peterson-iek encounter was the ultra-rare case of a debate in 2019 that was perhaps too civil. Let me mention the change enacted by Christianity. A democracy this logic to the political space in spite of all differences in competence, the ultimate decision should stay with all of us. Most of the attacks on me are now precisely from left liberals. {notificationOpen=false}, 2000);" x-data="{notificationOpen: false, notificationTimeout: undefined, notificationText: ''}">, We all get monkey mind and neuroscience supports the Buddhist solution, The mystery of New Zealands Tamil Bell, an archaeological UFO. How Jordan Peterson Lost His 'Debate' Against Slavoj Zizek - The Federalist Error message: "The request cannot be completed because you have exceeded your. "almost all ideas are wrong". I encourage you to watch the video or read the transcript Similarly, he's crusading against Conservative thinkers claim that the origin of our crisis is the loss of our reliance on some transcendent divinity. manifesto, which he'd re-read for the occasion. Tonight, "philosopher" Slavoj iek will debate "psychologist" Jordan Peterson in Toronto, ostensibly on the subject of Capitalism vs. Marxism. This Was An Interesting Debate. [2], Peterson has been seen as misusing the term postmodernism, referring to postmodern philosophy, as a stand-in term for the far-right and antisemitic Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory. In fact, this was a surprise for many, but both men tended to agree a whole lot, He wandered between the Paleolithic period and small business management, appearing to know as little about the former as the latter. From the Zizek-Peterson debate. #philosophytiktok #philosophy #slavojz The Jordan Peterson-Slavoj iek debate was good for something Andray Domise: Debate has its place in debunking bad actors and their ideas, but it only works when the participants have. But, it is instantly clear how this self-denigration brings a profit of its own. intellectuals). Scientific data seems, to me at least, abundant enough. 'Crustacean Jung v Cocaine Hegel': Zizek-Peterson debate - RT MeToo is all too often a genuine protest filtered through resentment. [15], Several publications, such as Current Affairs, The Guardian and Jacobin, criticized Peterson for being uninformed on Marxism and seemingly ill-prepared for the debate. He too finished his remarks with a critique of political correctness, which he described as the world of impotence that masks pure defeat. First, since we live in a modern era, we cannot simply refer to an unquestionable authority to confer a mission or task on us. Both Zizek and Peterson transcend their titles, their disciplines, and the academy, just as this debate we hope will transcend purely economic questions by situating those in the frame of happiness of human flourishing itself. Directly sharing your experience with our beloved may appear attractive, but what about sharing them with an agency without you even knowing it? It can be watched on Jordan Peterson's channel here. No his conservatism is a post-modern performance, a gigantic ego trip. This largely contrasts Peterson's viewpoint who admittedly has never used that term to refer in any way to the associated conspiracy theory, but only to raise critique about cultural phenomena that are, according to him, directly associated with postmodern thought. Then once you factor in the notion that much of Marxism is . The tone of the debate was also noted to be very Nothing Is a Greater Waste of Time Than the Planned Debate Between First, on how happiness is often the wrong Cookie Notice I cannot but notice the irony of how Peterson and I, the participants in this duel of the century, are both marginalised by the official academic community. It came right at the end of ieks opening 30-minute remarks. Secret Spice Girls dance parties of the wives of anti-western morality police. Web nov 14, 2022. Peterson debate Transcript? : r/zizek - reddit PDF The Debate between Slavoj iek and Jordan Peterson - CORE And, incidentally Im far from believing in ordinary peoples wisdom. But if violence perpetuated in the name of an idea is supposed to disqualify the idea, then more people have died in the name of communism and nationalism than any other idea. Slavoj Zizek Peterson Debate - DEBATGR Still, that criticism would be salutary for most "communists" Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GM35zlrE01k. They dont mention communism to legitimise their rule, they prefer the old Confucian notion of a harmonious society. Maybe that's why last night I finally caved and watched Canadian psychology professor Jordan Peterson take on Slovenian quasi-Marxist psychoanalyst and cultural theorist Slavoj Zizek. I cleaned up the Zizek's second turn speaking, since that section seemed to contain many errors: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qs7mNIUsYt9kWcdO785ec_dEWmEHLo92yTso0CVtxNk/edit?usp=sharing. A New World Order is emerging, a world of peaceful co-existence of civilisations, but in what way does it function? Let me mention just the idea that is floating around of solar radiation management, the continuous massive dispersal of aerosols into our atmosphere, to reflect and absorb sunlight, and thus cool the planet. semi-intentionally quite funny. You can find a transcript of it here. This is how refugees are created. more disjointed. Here is the original video extracted from https://www.jordanvsslavojdebate.com (livestream.com HLS source) using ffmpeg from Akamai CDN with the original audio and custom CC transcribed. "Qu produce ms felicidad, el marxismo o el capitalismo?". After writing less than nothing, zizek thought that he didn't yet get to the basic thought, that is the reason he wrote absolute recoil, a more difficult book than less than nothing, according. strongest point. One interesting point Zizek and Peterson both seemed to agree on is the opinion that humans arent strictly rational beings. Posted on August 20, 2021 by David Roman. Happiness is a confused notion, basically it relies on the subjects inability or unreadiness to fully confront the consequences of his / her / their desire. But I nonetheless found it interesting. Its trademarks universal health care, free education, and so on are continually diminished. And what about foreign interventions in Iraq and Syria, or by our proxies like Saudi Arabia in Yemen? And that was the great irony of the debate: what it comes down to is that they believe they are the victims of a culture of victimization. About No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis "post-modern neo-marxists" and it's strange not to understand or at least know This is NOT a satire/meme sub. [, moderator, president of Ralston College, Doctor Stephen Blackwood. Peterson and Zizek Debate - transcribed by John Li - johnmhli@berkeley.edu - 916 623 5512 - https://chicago.academia.edu/JohnLi - // I used both voice to text software and then a manual read through - there are still plenty of transcription errors I haven't caught and corrected (I didn't expect this to come out to be over 20 pages and how They are both concerned with more fundamental. There are two teams, each consisting of two or three speakers. In totalitarian states, competencies are determined politically. A French guy gave me this idea, that the origin of many famous French dishes or drinks is that when they wanted to produce a standard piece of food or drink, something went wrong, but then they realised that this failure can be resold as success. The true utopia is that we can survive without such a change. In this sense, the image of Donald Trump is also a fetish, the last thing a liberal sees before confronting actual social tensions. Peterson and Zizek Debate Transcription : r/zizek - reddit people consumed the debate. EL DEBATE DEL SIGLO: Slavoj iek y Jordan Peterson Disfrut la discusin filosfica entre Michel Onfay y Alain Badiou , pesos pesados del pensamiento alternativo, y qued satisfecho. 2 Piano Mono - moshimo sound design. First, a brief introductory remark. Post was not sent - check your email addresses! Such thinking also underpinned Peterson arguing that no matter what social system you build, communism included, power will always fall to a select group. They were making in the usual way, but the cheese got rotten and infected, smelling bad, and they said, oh my god, look, we have our own original French cheese. For transcription of Zizeks first exposition (the actually coherent one I believe), I found that it had already been transcribed on Reddit during my own transcription so I integrated it into this one. They didnt understand what is happening to them with military defeat, economic crisis, what they perceived as moral decay, and so on. The pathological element is the husbands need for jealousy as the only way for him to sustain his identity. Let me now briefly deal with in a friendly way I claim with what became known sorry for the irony as the lobster topic. Scholarly publications with full text pdf download. List of journal articles on the topic 'Marxism in politics, economy and philosophy / Criticism'. Zizek vs Peterson: A Muslim Perspective - Berkeley Institute for There was a livestream which people could pay to access that peaked at around 6,000 viewers. officially desire. The Petersoniek debate, officially titled Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism, was a debate between the Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson (a clinical psychologist and critic of Marxism) and the Slovenian philosopher Slavoj iek (a psychoanalyst and Hegelian) on the relationship between Marxism, capitalism, and happiness. What qualifies them to pass a judgement in such a delicate matter? Peterson was an expert on this subject, at least. Its not just that in spite of all our natural and cultural differences the same divine sparks dwells in everyone. That the debate will be live-streamed and more than 1,400 people have already dropped $14.95 for. We have to find some meaningful cause beyond the mere struggle for pleasurable survival. But there is nonetheless the prospect of a catastrophe here. [16] Similarly to Winston Churchill, he concluded that "capitalism is the worst economic system, except for all the others". One hated communism. [Scattered Audience applause and cheers]Both Doctor iek and Peterson transcend their titles, their disciplines, and the academy, just as this debatewe hopewill transcend purely economic questions by situating those in the frame He makes a big deal out of how he obsessed about El debate Peterson-iek, oficialmente titulado Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism, fue un debate entre el psiclogo canadiense Jordan Peterson (crtico del marxismo) y el filsofo esloveno Slavoj iek ( comunista y hegeliano) sobre la relacin entre marxismo, capitalismo y felicidad. Zizek makes many interesting points. Studies suggest that meditation can quiet the restless brain. Hegels motto Evil resides in the gaze which sees evil everywhere fully applies here. It will be certain only it will be too late, and I am well aware of the temptation to engage in precipitous extrapolations. IQ, Politics, and the Left: A Conversation with Douglas Murray Transcript Nina Paley: Animator Extraordinaire Transcript Aspen Ideas Festival: From the Barricades of the Culture Wars Transcript The time has come to step back and interpret it. Far from pushing us too far, the Left is gradually losing its ground already for decades. His comments on one of the greatest feats of human rhetoric were full of . Slavoj iek - RationalWiki [1] They debated about the merits of regulated capitalism. Zizek and Peterson sell books for cash, but cash is just what you need for the real prize: the minds of men. He's also quite Original reporting and incisive analysis, direct from the Guardian every morning. something wrong was said therein, you ought to engage the content rather than The Master and His Emissary: A Conversation with Dr. Iain McGilchrist Transcript . "[1][6] According to Matthew Sharpe writing for The Conversation, .mw-parser-output .templatequote{overflow:hidden;margin:1em 0;padding:0 40px}.mw-parser-output .templatequote .templatequotecite{line-height:1.5em;text-align:left;padding-left:1.6em;margin-top:0}, the term 'cultural Marxism' moved into the media mainstream around 2016, when psychologist Jordan Peterson was protesting a Canadian bill prohibiting discrimination based on gender. So, how to act? He sees the rejections of some systemic failures of capitalism onto external White, left liberals love to denigrate their own culture and claim euro-centrism for our evils. Why do I still cling to this cursed name when I know and fully admit that the 20th century Communist project in all its failure, how it failed, giving birth to new forms of murderous terror. interrupts himself to add "I will finish immediately" before finishing the joke. wanted to review a couple of passages and i didnt need to go through the video! A warm welcome to all of you here this evening, both those here in the, theatre in Toronto and those following online. And here applies the same logic to Christ himself. It is todays capitalism that equalizers us too much and causes the loss of many talents. Having previously enjoyed and written about both slavoj zizek and jordan peterson, i was interested to learn they'd have a debate. The past should be altered by the present as much as the present is directed by the past end of quote. On Slavoj Zizek and Jordan Peterson: Nature, Culture, and the I see equality as a space for creating differences and yes, why not, even different more appropriate hierarchies. Related research topic ideas. He gave a minor history of the French critical theorists who transposed categories of class oppression for group oppression in the 1960s. In intellectual circles, the recent debate of the century between the Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson and Slovenian philosopher Slavoj Zizek was a real heavyweight bout. He also denied there is an inherent tendency under capitalism to mistreat the workers, stating you dont rise to a position of authority that is reliable in a human society primarily by exploiting other people. Overall, Peterson appeared to see capitalism as the best, though imperfect, economic model. That snapped him back into his skill set: self-defense. Billed as "The Debate of the Century", its official title was "Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism". But when youve said that, youve said everything. Both of these men know that they are explicitly throwbacks. wrote about commons before). If we learned anything from psychoanalysis, its that we humans are very creative in sabotaging our pursuit of happiness. Second yes, we should carry our burden and accept the suffering that goes with it. By the end of his half-hour he had not mentioned the word happiness once. Come here for focussed discussion and debate on the Giant of Ljubljana, Slavoj iek and the Slovenian school of psychoanalytically informed philosophy. Debate Peterson-iek - Wikipedia, la enciclopedia libre I did see the debate of the century, the debate of our century. Peterson opens with a 30-minutes speech where he criticizes the communist Live Commentary on the iek-Peterson Debate | Current Affairs They passionately support LGBT, they advocate charities and so on. Presidential debate 2020 RECAP What happened in the first election from www.the-sun.com. When somebody tries to convince me, in spite of all these problems, there is a light at the end of the tunnel, my instant reply is, Yes, and its another train coming towards us. What I Learned at the 'Debate' Between Jordan Peterson and Slavoj iek iek was less a cognizant thinker and more a pathological sacred cow tipper while Peterson was a bard for the. Again, the wager of democracy is that and thats the subtle thing not against competence and so on, but that political power and competence or expertise should be kept apart. sticking to "his camp", but I feel like the resulting discussing ended up more It's quite interesting, but it's not It is just a version of what half a century ago in Europe was simply the predominant social democracy, and it is today decried as a threat to our freedoms, to the American way of life, and so on and so on. Who could? Zizek's opening statement is probably the most interesting part of the debate. Petersons opening remarks were disappointing even for his fans in the audience. Peterson has risen to fame on the basis of his refusal to pay the usual fealties to political correctness. Another issue is that it's hard to pin down what communism is In our human universe, power, in the sense of exerting authority, is something much more mysterious, even irrational. : Just a few words of introduction. yardstick: In our daily lives, we pretend to desire things which we do not really desire, Bonus: Zizek on the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Zizek on the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. El debate entre iek y Peterson se produjo en Toronto, Canad. He said things like Marx thought the proletariat was good and the bourgeoisie was evil. Regarding to the Peterson-Zizek debate as a whole, yes, I would recommend a listen. If we are left to ourselves, if everything is historically conditioned and relative, then there is nothing preventing us from indulging in our lowest tendencies. imblazintwo 4 yr. ago Like I said before, I appreciated immensely that both men seemed pretty much on Credits for this section should go to the hard work of Xiao Ouyang and Shunji Ukai //, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rUhYdqB2Jh7CU5Le0XgktKaoXQmnTdbv0-_kE5BQL6Q/edit?usp=sharing, Thank you so much for this, I had trouble understanding Zizek's pronunciation of the book on Christ's Atheism on the cross. Peterson-iek debate - Wikipedia This is why as many perspicuous philosophers clearly saw, evil is profoundly spiritual, in some sense more spiritual than goodness. It was in this opening argument that Zizek effectively won the debate to the extent it was a debate at all. Capitalism threatens the commons due to its Now, let me be precise here Im well aware uncertain analysis and projections are in this domain. [19] Harrison Fluss and Sam Miller of Jacobin reported that Peterson made many factual errors, such as misunderstanding the labour theory of value, incorrectly associating Marx broadly with identity politics, and denying the existence of a Marxist philosophy of nature. of the Century" was overhyped (overmarketed, really), and seemed poorly prepared The wager of democracy is that we should not give all power to competent experts, because precisely Communists in power who, legitimise this rule, by posing as fake experts. Modernity means that yes, we should carry the burden, but the main burden is freedom itself. Democratic freedom, rapturous religion, and newspapers created a hotbed for social experimentation in 19th-century America. The Fool and the Madman - Jacobin Marxism: Zizek/Peterson: Official Video - YouTube And its important to note they do it on behalf of the majority of people. Error type: "Forbidden". What people are saying about Jordan Peterson's upcoming showdown with Elements of a formal debate. Zizek also pinpointed white liberal multiculturalism as the reason for the Lefts current political woes. However, in place of charging a fee and in recognition of the work I put, in, I would strongly ask anybody who found extensive use of it to give a small donation of $5 or more to. ) They both wanted the same thing: capitalism with regulation, which is what every sane person wants. El denominado "Debate del siglo" entre el filsofo y socilogo esloveno Slavoj iek y el psiclogo canadiense Jordan Peterson, fue uno de los eventos intelectuales de mayor trascendencia del ltimo tiempo. And Peterson agreed with him: It is not obvious to me that we can solve the problems that confront us. They are both self-described radical pessimists, about people and the world. GitHub - djentleman/zizek_v_peterson: Markov Chain Based Zizek v A renunciation of pleasure can easily turn in pleasure of renunciation itself. We're in for quite a night a quick word about format. This page has been accessed 35,754 times. Below is the transcript of Zizek's introductory statement. It has been said of the debate that " nothing is a greater waste of time ." Tickets to the livestream are $14.95, and admission to the venue itself was running as high as $1,500. This I think is the true game changed. I am supposed to defend here the left, liberal line against neo-conservatives. Competencies for what? [9] Billed by some as "the debate of the century",[2] the event had more tickets scalped than the Toronto Maple LeafsBoston Bruins playoff on the same day, and tickets sold on eBay for over $300. it's made of many idea nuggets only tenuously linked to one other although [1], Around 3,000 people were in Meridian Hall in Toronto for the event. She observed in a recent critical note that in the years since the movement began it deployed an unwavering obsession with the perpetrators. cordial and respectful, something I really appreciated. He has not one, sudden cheer, iek shrugs off audience reaction, the University of Ljubljana and a second in psychoanalysis from University, lets hear it for psychoanalysis! Warlords who rule provinces there are always dealing with Western companies, selling them minerals where would our computers be without coltan from Congo? The turn towards culture as a key component of capitalist reproduction and concurrent to it the commodification of cultural life itself are I think crucial moments of capitalism expanded reproduction. They do not have an answer to the real problems that face us: the environment and the rise of China as a successful capitalist state without democracy. So, I agree that human life of freedom and dignity does not iek and Peterson met in Toronto on Friday. Refresh the. And, in the new afterword, Bell offers a bracing perspective of contemporary Western societies, revealing the crucial cultural fault lines we face as the 21st century is here. Doctor Slavoj iek is as philosopher. It's funny to see Peterson Zizek expressed his agreement with Petersons critique of PC culture, pointing out that he is attacked as much by the Left that he supposedly represents as the right. Please feel free to correct this document. Peterson was humiliated deeply in it, having to admit he'd never read any Marx despite demonizing him for years, and only having skimmed one of Marx' books before showing up to debate Marxism with an actual Marx scholar (among other. with its constellation of thinkers. your opponent's ideas. But precisely due to the marketing, Highlights of the "debate of the century": Jordan Peterson and Slavoj Zizek iek is also defined, and has been for years, by his contempt for postmodern theory and, by extension, the more academic dimensions of political correctness. We are responsible for our burdens. The very premise of tonight's event is that we all participate in the life of, thought. "If you have a good theory, forget about the reality. The controversial thinkers debated happiness, capitalism and Marxism in Toronto. Watching him, I was amazed that anyone had ever taken him seriously enough to hate him. But, a danger lurks here, that of a subtly reversal: dont fall in love thats my position with your suffering. When I was younger to give you a critical example there was in Germany with obsession with the dying of forests with predictions that in a couple of decades Europe would be without forests. A big deal, with huge numbers, and really very little underneath. Slavoj iek - Wikizero.com I was surprised (and a bit disappointed) that Peterson didn't seem more [16] Due to lack of defence for Marxism, at one point Peterson asked iek why he associates with this ideology and not his philosophical originality, on which iek answered that he is rather a Hegelian and that capitalism has too many antagonisms for long-term peaceful sustainability. Chopin Nocturne No. Die Analyse dieser Figur findet mit starkem Bezug zur Etablierung Other commentators opted for snide, which I think is sad although the linked And they both agreed, could not have agreed more, that it was all the fault of the academic left. either, but points a problem with capitalism on what Marx called "commons" (I The title of the debate was "Happiness: Capitalism v. Marxism." The structure of the debate was that each participant presented a thirty-minute introduction followed by a series of brief ten-minute responses to one another. Peterson's more practically-oriented style also made his arguments a bit more approachable to non-academics. Explain The Format And Rules Of A Formal Debate. - DEBATE JKW His comments on one of the greatest feats of human rhetoric were full of expressions like You have to give the devil his due and This is a weird one and Almost all ideas are wrong. Incidentally, so that you will not think that I do not know what I am talking about, in Communist countries those in power were obsessed with expanded reproduction, and were not under public control, so the situation was even worse. Live Commentary on the iek-Peterson Debate Current Affairs It seems that our countries are run relatively well, but is the mess the so-called rogue countries find themselves in not connected to how we interact with them? clear these are coherent thoughts from the same thinker. The Peterson-iek encounter was the ultra-rare case of a debate in 2019 that was perhaps too civil. Zizek and Peterson went head-to-head recently at a debate in Toronto. Zizek: The paradox to be happy there not a crucial misunderstanding here. So, a pessimist conclusion, what will happen? Its all anyone can do at this point. The debate, titled "Happiness: Marxism vs. Capitalism," pitted Jordan Peterson against Slavoj iek, two of the West's reigning public intellectuals. Two Famous Academics, 3,000 Fans, $1,500 Tickets It also helps to put Zizek's ideas and role in modern political discussion in .