Where the applicants have ticked any boxes confirming that the application involves either animal research or human participation, then you are asked to comment specifically on any ethical considerations and particularly on whether ethical approval procedures have been complied with. You are asked throughout to assess the application but be clear that this means the ideas, concepts and approaches contained therein, and not the specific form of the document itself. an early career researcher who meets the eligibility requirements of the EPSRC New Investigator Award scheme. This funding opportunity is also subject to our policy on repeatedly unsuccessful submissions. Projects should be self-contained and have a single research vision with clearly defined objectives and outcomes. Closing date 24 March 2023. Text in tables and figure labels not within embedded diagrams or pictures should be at least 11 point. whether the proposal details potential outcomes and clearly identifies any potential impacts. Dr Pierangelo Gobbo said: "Currently, the research field of bottom-up synthetic biology is trying to fill the gap between biology and chemistry to better understand . The weighting between the remaining aspects will depend on the specific nature of the particular application. You should also comment on the suitability of arrangements for accessing resources other than through the grant, such as by collaboration with external groups. Research has the ability to not only produce understanding, knowledge and value, but also unintended consequences, questions, ethical dilemmas and, at times, unexpected social transformations. You will not be able to apply after this time until the opportunity reopens on the Funding Service in May 2023. New Investigator Award - EPSRC - Research Councils UK A proposal that demonstrates excellence can be characterised by terms such as: novel, ambitious, timely, exciting, at the international forefront, adventurous, elegant, or transformative, but it need not demonstrate all of them. This should reflect your overall conclusion, and should be consistent with your comments on the individual sections of your review, taking account of all the assessment criteria and the various weightings you applied. Aviation-to-Grid: Grid flexibility through multiscale modelling and existing engagements with relevant end users and the appropriateness of any partnerships. CVs, not exceeding two A4 sides each, should be submitted as separate attachments using Attachment Type CV in Je-S, and are only required for named research staff or visiting researchers. We expect the proposed collaborative project to present a balance between partnership building activities and direct research, as appropriate, considering the key objectives of the funding opportunity. Sustainable bio-based materials and manufacture: feasibility study. Customer Reviews. Your application is assessed first and foremost on quality (primary), followed by national importance (secondary major). stream 2 (for established or mature clusters): estimate 3 to 5 awards with maximum 5 million per award, over 4 years; Standard EPSRC eligibility rules apply. Pre-proposal writing steps - thinking about the proposal. You should not use journal-based metrics, such as journal impact factors, as a surrogate measure of the quality of individual research articles, to assess an investigators contributions, or to make funding decisions. In the context of this call early career researchers are defined as those who are currently eligible to apply to, or have been eligible to apply to in the past eight years, EPSRC New Investigator Awards, First Grants, Early Career Fellowships, Career Acceleration Fellowships, Challenging Engineering and Healthcare Technology Challenge Awards. We recognise that information provided in the full proposal, including the names of the international partners, may differ from the information provided in the intention to submit form. To assist the prioritisation panel in reaching their overall conclusion on the application, and to help EPSRC in monitoring the effectiveness of its reviewer selection procedures, you are asked to indicate your confidence in your review. To help us with data analysis, do not include the words COV-19, COVID-19 or Coronavirus in the lay summary, technical summary or title sections unless your application relates to proposed research in this area. The purpose of the New Investigator Award (NIA) scheme is to address a gap which has been identified in the funding landscape and support researchers in their transition to an independent research career. You should ensure you are aware of and follow any internal institutional deadlines that may be in place. You can save completed details in Je-S at any time and return to continue your application later. Position type Full time, fixed term. Your assessment should be based solely on the resources sought and not on the costs derived from them. As an internationally collaborative grant, particular attention should be paid to standard conditions 2.6.1 and 2.6.2. Stage one. Develop and integrate energy storage technologies at grid scale . You should comment explicitly on this aspect of the proposal and where possible give your view of where this work would sit in relation to related activity internationally, and the extent to which it would provide the UK with a unique capability. EPSRC therefore allows applicants to tailor the support that they request in order to facilitate this. British Geotechnical Association - Gold Medal for best paper of 2020 2020. International Young Geotechnical Engineer Conference Award, Engineers Ireland Aug 2009. To find the opportunity, search for: NSF Global Centres. For sensitive information the applicant should state clearly whether the information is confidential. They should be completed in single-spaced Arial 11 font or similar-sized sans serif typeface. Date posted 2 March 2023. As part of the impact assessment, reviewers comment on whether a collaboration is appropriate; therefore, a good project partner letter of support shows that the collaboration is genuine, and explains why the project partner supports the project. The aim of the scheme is to support them in establishing a research group and developing their own research vision. Download the New Investigator peer review form. If you have a concern that the application raises ethical issues that have not been clearly identified or addressed, you should raise this directly with EPSRC, which will need to make a policy decision on how the application should be treated. New Investigator Award: Starts: 01 October 2019: Ends: 30 September 2023: Value (): 280,530: EPSRC Research Topic Classifications: Catalysis & Applied Catalysis: Materials Characterisation: Materials Synthesis & Growth: . Sign up for news, views, events and funding alerts. If applications to the open funding route and international development funding route are assessed at the same panel they will be ranked on separate rank order lists. 15 Customer reviews. The New Investigator Award scheme (which replaces the First Grant scheme) includes a number of changes from the previous scheme of which researchers who are considering applying should be aware.. Certainty of outcome is not an indicator of excellence, but neither is an incremental approach necessarily an indicator that a proposal lacks excellence. This must be attached, as a single document, using the Case for Support attachment type in the Joint Electronic Submission (Je-S) system. The new investigator award is for people who hold an academic lectureship position at UK higher education institutions, research council institutes, UKRI-approved independent research organisations and NHS bodies, and have not previously led an academic research group or been the recipient of a significant grant. You can request funding to support any eligible international collaborative activities, including (but not limited to): As per standard New Investigator Award guidance, you can include co-investigators if the grant crosses disciplinary boundaries and it is demonstrated that they are from a different discipline to the principal investigator. No closing dates apply to the scheme. Let us know if you have feedback or would like to help us test new developments. For example: The research councils Code of Conduct and policy on the governance of good research conduct outlines the expectation that applicants for research council funding are expected to observe the highest standards of integrity, honesty and professionalism and to embed good practice in every aspect of their work. We are always open for applications for new investigator awards. Find out more about our research areas and themes. The New Investigator Award scheme (which replaces the First Grant scheme) includes a number of changes from the previous scheme of which researchers who are considering applying should be aware.. Proposed collaborations for this open funding route may involve international research partners from any country, this can include researchers in 1 or more lower middle income, low income, or least developed countries on the Development Assistance Committee list, where the focus of the research is outside the official development assistance compliance criteria. EPSRC Impact Acceleration Account | Research | Queen's University Belfast Standard letters declaring general support for a project are often criticised by reviewers. If a studentship is aligned in this way, it should be clear in the case for support and work plan how the work of the student will both contribute to the project and ensure successful completion of the students PhD. When applying: Select 'documents', then 'new document'. EPSRC new investigator award. Acceptance to the New Investigator Award scheme is judged by EPSRC before the application is sent to expert peer review and is made on the basis of the content of the cover letter and the level of resources requested in the application. Clinical research training fellowship. All costs will be funded at 80% of full economic costs. Find out more about completing your application. It will be sent electronically to at least three reviewers, including at least one nominated by you. Specific guidance is available for each section of the report to be completed. If you need a transcript of the video on writing strong funding applications, email the web team: web@ukri.org. Expression of interest: Human Functional Genomics Initiative clusters comment on the effectiveness of the proposed planning and management, and on whether the requested resources are appropriate and have been fully justified. Summary. Finally the presentation will ask how organisations such as FIG and ISPRS can play a part in these developments. F.D.G. EPSRC recognises that the COVID-19 pandemic has caused major interruptions and disruptions across our communities and is committed to ensuring that individual applicants and their wider team, including partners and networks, are not penalised for any disruption to their career such as breaks and delays, disruptive working patterns and conditions, the loss of ongoing work, and role changes that may have been caused by the pandemic. University of Glasgow - Schools - James Watt School of Engineering Complex, multifaceted research projects with many objectives are not appropriate for this scheme. Where you believe that there are less than three potential suppliers for an item you should explain this in the justification of resources. If youre applying through the New Investigator Award scheme, you should attach a statement from your host university, typically your head of department describe the universitys commitment to your research career development, and confirm your appointment details and period of probation if relevant. You can apply for a new investigator award at any time in any field of research relevant to our remit. Select 'call search'. As impact should be an embedded activity in the research programme, you should also assess the suitability and appropriateness of the methodology to realise impact in the proposal. These notes are intended to provide reviewers with specific guidance for the completion of the reviewer form. However, they are not subject to the same eligibility restrictions as new . (for example, shipping ports) or where clusters are connected across several sites (for example, as a result of their supply chain or other activity . Therefore, you should not use journal impact factor (or any hierarchy of journals), conference rankings and metrics such as the H-index or i10-index when assessing UKRI grants. The response must be a maximum of 2 pages. You should comment on how clearly this is described, how appropriate it is for the planned activities, and their scientific and technical feasibility. whether the applicant has identified potential stakeholders and stated the relevance and possible benefits to the stakeholders. EPSRC Reference: EP/V002260/1: . Before starting an application, you will need to log in or create an account in Je-S. Once you have completed your application, make sure you submit document. You can request funds for anything eligible under standard EPSRC rules. The applicant should have provided appropriate methodology to deliver the research and impact programme. NERC - the Natural Environment Research Council Swindon. This funding opportunity is only open to early career researchers who meet the eligibility requirements of EPSRC's New Investigator Award scheme. EPSRC does not assess the presence or value of any matched funding provided by the university before making a funding decision. Normally you might expect to see a plausible hypothesis with some basis within the published literature, and some clearly identified objectives that sensibly test that hypothesis. NSF-EPSRC Organic Materials Workshop, London, England, March 2006. Epsrc.ac.uk. You should typically seek 10-20% of the principal investigators time. You are asked to assess the application or report against a number of criteria. It is important that EPSRC funds are used ethically and responsibly. Requests for resources should be clearly articulated in the justification of resources section of the grant application. However applicants are not expected to work in isolation but will benefit from support from the university and the environment in which they will be working. This funding opportunity has 2 parallel funding routes: This page details the requirements for the open funding route of the funding opportunity. This will help applicants build an in-depth knowledge of our peer review processes and principles, helping you to further increase your knowledge of reviewing and proposal writing. Typical examples are the production of ammonia, which is a process that needs to be catalysed by iron, or the production . Apply before: February 3, 2023. Applicants must comply with the standard EPSRC terms for eligibility to hold research grants . Acceptance to the New Investigator Award scheme is judged by EPSRC before the application is sent to expert peer review and is made on the basis of the content of the cover letter and the level of resources requested in the application. Epsrc New Investigator Award Cover Letter: Order . PDF Fellowships in Energy and Engineering with the EPSRC and Royal Academy We recommend that all attachments are uploaded into Je-S as Adobe Acrobat files (PDF) as uploading word documents can result in layout changes to the document. illustrated by examples of recent activities. Impact can take many forms over widely varying timescales. If, for any reason, you feel that you are not able to assess the application, please advise EPSRC accordingly. You should hear the result of your application within 26 weeks of submission by your host organisation. The new target requires the UK to bring all greenhouse gas emissions to net-zero by 2050. In some instances, the case for support may include a link to a web site containing information on the research proposed. Flexible working includes, but is not limited to, reduction in full-time hours, long-term partial return to work, job sharing, compressed working hours, term-time only working, annualised hours. Text in embedded diagrams or pictures, numerical formulae or references can be smaller, as long as it is legible. EPSRC Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council : Start: 01-01-2022 / End: 31-12-2024 : Amount: 392,388: SEMS Division: Mechanical Engineering, Robotics and Design. Questions can be submitted prior to the event using the EPSRC international team email address or during the webinar using the question and answer function. You can find advice on completing your application in: We recommend you start your application early. If you do choose to look at this information, it is possible that your anonymity to the applicant will be compromised. whether the research programme and associated impact activities have been co-designed with external stakeholders or users: Does the proposal include objectives for impact related activities and are they appropriate to the research? Any investigators who do not have a Je-S account must register for one at least 7 working days before the opportunity deadline. Argentina; Bolivia; Brazil; Canada; Chile; Colombia; Costa Rica; Dominican Republic When you submit the application, it will first go to your host organisation for review. EPSRC will not support overheads, salary or research activity costs for overseas researchers during times that they are not working in the UK. There is no one format to an excellent research programme: the research could directly build on previous work, or it could take a leap forward. EPSRC complies with the General Data Protection Regulations 2016/679 (EU) (GDPR). A full justification for your assessment of the application should be provided. Applicants who intend to submit an application to this funding opportunity should complete the following intention to submit by 7 December 2022. Panels are organised by theme and meet at different times of the year. Include EPSRC ECR International Collaboration Grant open in the subject line. You will be given 2 weeks to provide a response to the questions raised by the introducers. The changes also mean that some researchers who may have previously been ineligible to . Your comments, scores and confidence level should explicitly reflect your views on those aspects you can assess, and you are asked not to moderate these in any way to reflect those areas you feel you cannot comment on. . Include how the research: Reviewers are requested to comment on the applicants ability to deliver the proposed project, making reference to: Appropriateness of the track record of the applicant(s): Balance of skills of the project team, including collaborators: Applicants are required to identify all resources required to undertake the project, and to clearly justify the request. Proposals may build directly on prior work or may involve a speculative leap forward. The reviewer form asks reviewers to score their confidence as low, medium or high. New Investigator Award. Case for support. EPSRC may reject applications that do not meet attachment format requirements. NIA1: Acceptance to the Scheme. Awards & honorary positions 1992 Schermerhorn Award - International Society of Photogrammetry and Remote NIA provide foundational funds to initiate a research group. Prospective applicants are invited to join a webinar on 16 November 2022 at 10:00am UK time. Impact acceleration account (IAA) is a strategic award that provides funding to Queen's University for a wide range of impact activities. A full justification for your assessment of the application should be included in each section. for example, EPSRC New Investigator Awards or Fellowships. The application you are asked to review includes a case for support. There is no page limit, but letters should be on headed paper, and be signed and dated within six months of the proposal submission date. Posts responsible for: None. Think of this as your report to the prioritisation panel, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses you identified in the individual questions and then making a clear and explicit recommendation about whether or not you believe the application warrants funding. Different reviewers will have been asked to cover those aspects you cannot, and the panel will then have the job of integrating these different comments. the Organisation for Economic Development (OECD). Direct responsibility to the holders of the research award. CAREER "Utilization of Mechanochemistry for the Minimization of Solvent Waste" National Science . Our project is a collaborative one between two Universities and a national laboratory working together across a combined theoretical and experimental programme. You should also consider that this unequal impact may continue beyond the return to work. The Functional Genomics Initiative Clusters funding opportunity has two stages. Reviewers should assess the application based on the criteria listed in the review form on the understanding that EPSRC has accepted the application to the scheme. https://www.ukri.org/councils/epsrc/guidance-for-reviewers/peer-reviews/reviewer-forms-and-guidance-notes/new-investigator-award, Browse our areas of investment and support, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), Download the New Investigator peer review form, San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment, part-time working for the principal investigator, co-investigators, post-doctoral research assistants, technicians or wider team costed on a grant, support for costs over and above standard care arrangements to allow the principal investigator or their team to attend activities associated with the grant (for example conferences) where costs cannot be met by the employer. case for support: eight pages two on your track record and six on the scientific case, CVs: up to two A4 sides each only for named postdoctoral staff, researcher- co-investigators (research assistants who have made a substantial contribution to the proposal and will be employed on the project for a significant amount of time), and visiting researchers, letters of support from all project partners included in the Je-S form: no page limit, quotes for equipment above 25,000: no page limit, equipment business case for any items or combined assets with a value above 138,000: up to two pages, technical assessment for the use of any major facilities listed in Je-S guidance: no page limit, a statement of support from your host research organisation: no page limit. DOCX Senior Research Fellow We expect the level of funding to vary but be appropriate to the proposed research programme. Personal award. The UK research organisation should include estate costs and indirect costs for any visiting researcher regardless of whether the support being requested includes a salary contribution or is only travel and subsistence. Consequently, as part of our 2022 to 2025 delivery plan we will provide opportunities for our research and innovation base to connect with international leaders and facilitate joint working between the UK research community and their preferred global partners. We understand that in some research areas it might be more appropriate to request up to 35%, however anything above this would be more appropriate in standard mode. Speaker: Dirk Husmeier. Grants are awarded under the standard UK Research and Innovation grant terms and conditions. Researchers at UCL and University of Ghana have successfully predicted whether children have anaemia using only a set of smartphone images. The scheme aims to support them in establishing a research group and developing their research vision. The aim of the scheme is to support them in establishing a research group and developing their own research vision. seek to assess tangibility of deliverables, direct return on investment or detailed routes to exploitation impact is not synonymous with early exploitation. It is preferable that collaborative partners will contribute cash to the project, although "tangible" material contributions from industrial collaborators may also be consider (project number 18244), the UK EPSRC New Investigator Award CodeCPS (EP/V043676/1), and the Horizon Europe EIC project SymAware (101070802). Professor Chris Freeman is a Professor at the University of Southampton Where applicants wish to include details on flexible working or a career break for reviewers to take into account in their assessment, they are not required to explain the personal circumstances that resulted in the need for this. Applications will only be assessed by 1 panel. EPSRC guidance can be found in the additional info section. This helps reviewers make informed judgements about whether the resources requested are appropriate for the research proposed. Let us know if you have feedback or would like to help us test new developments. On Tuesday 25 July 2017 a New Investigator Award scheme replaced the First Grant initiative. Find out more about what to include in the case for support. In that case you should identify those aspects that you are able to comment on, and then give your review on just those aspects. The international academic project partners must also have an integral role in the proposed work. EPSRC Reference: EP/W028905/1: Title: Aviation-to-Grid: Grid flexibility through multiscale modelling and integration of power systems with electrified air transport . As with all EPSRC grants, applicants should request the appropriate suite of resources to carry out the proposed research. For more information on these EPSRC funding calls, visit the website >>. It should cover the context, importance, methodology and all the associated work and activities you propose to carry out that will make this a high-quality research programme. Three quotations for any equipment costing more than 25,000 should accompany the proposal. whether the roles and responsibilities of all members of the team have been defined, including those of users or stakeholders in both research and impact activities. This includes but is not limited to funding available to cover: Support may be requested for international partners (both investigators and researchers). It is particularly important therefore that the panel have clear advice on the merits of each component. It is expected that most proposals will have the potential to deliver some form of non-academic impact. Arial narrow and Calibri are not allowable font types. . This is mainly assured by requiring that universities have in place and operate appropriate ethical approval processes. SySCoRe arXiv:2302.12294v1 [eess.SY] 23 Feb 2023 - Introduction-Tellthemtheoverallresearchgoal&convincethemyoucandeliverit. The Vice Chancellor's Fellow at the School of Chemistry of the University of Bristol, has won an EPSRC New Investigator Award worth 392,000. call/type/mode: Early Career Researchers International Collaboration Grants, case for support (8 pages, 2 on your track record and 6 on the scientific case). Research Fellow in Materials Chemistry - School of Chemistry - 101098 The duration of the project should be appropriate to deliver these typically 1 to 3 years. The scale may also vary significantly, depending on the focus of the award. Unfunded applications will not have their information published. is based at a UK research organisation eligible for EPSRC funding. Epsrc New Investigator Award Cover Letter: Robert. Complex, multi-faceted research projects with many objectives are not appropriate for this scheme. You and your international partners may have a previous relationship, but we do not expect you to have worked together extensively. EPSRC have this week re-launched their grant funding scheme targeted specifically at Early Career Researchers. This occurs when an organisation cannot be listed as a project partner, for example when the host institution wants to detail a proposed contribution to the cost of the equipment. Projects should be self-contained and comprise a single research vision with clearly defined objectives and outcomes.